<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sale consideration from bank auction at fair market value, no addition for undervalued property.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80568</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(x) addition - difference between fair market value and sale consideration not applicable when property purchased through bank auction, being a statutory process without scope for understatement of consideration. Tribunal&#039;s view upheld that Assessing Officer erred in making such addition, set aside Commissioner&#039;s order in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sale consideration from bank auction at fair market value, no addition for undervalued property.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80568</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(x) addition - difference between fair market value and sale consideration not applicable when property purchased through bank auction, being a statutory process without scope for understatement of consideration. Tribunal&#039;s view upheld that Assessing Officer erred in making such addition, set aside Commissioner&#039;s order in assessee&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 08:57:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>