https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260 The HC dismissed the appeal, upholding revocation of the customs broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The court accepted factual findings that the broker failed to advise the importer to comply with clearance rules, advised mis-declaration to evade Foreign Trade Policy and Arms Act requirements, and knew the goods were blank-firing guns requiring DGFT and Arms Act licenses. Because the findings were factual and accepted by the Tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the administrative sanctions were maintained. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260 The HC dismissed the appeal, upholding revocation of the customs broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The court accepted factual findings that the broker failed to advise the importer to comply with clearance rules, advised mis-declaration to evade Foreign Trade Policy and Arms Act requirements, and knew the goods were blank-firing guns requiring DGFT and Arms Act licenses. Because the findings were factual and accepted by the Tribunal, no substantial question of law arose, and the administrative sanctions were maintained. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260