https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260 The Bombay High Court noted that the challenge was confined to factual findings accepted by the Tribunal, including the appellant's role in advising compliance with import and arms-related requirements and its knowledge of misdeclaration and misclassification. Because no independent legal principle or fresh question of law was shown, the Court found that no substantial question of law arose for appellate consideration. The impugned decision was therefore not interfered with on that basis, and the forfeiture of the security deposit stood on the factual record accepted below. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Oct 2025 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260 The Bombay High Court noted that the challenge was confined to factual findings accepted by the Tribunal, including the appellant's role in advising compliance with import and arms-related requirements and its knowledge of misdeclaration and misclassification. Because no independent legal principle or fresh question of law was shown, the Court found that no substantial question of law arose for appellate consideration. The impugned decision was therefore not interfered with on that basis, and the forfeiture of the security deposit stood on the factual record accepted below. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757260