https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456846 The Calcutta HC noted that disputed questions of fact concerning the existence of the consignor and consignee and ownership of the seized goods were unsuitable for writ adjudication, so the statutory appellate forum was the proper remedy. The writ challenge to the adjudication order and detention of goods was therefore not entertained on merits. Limited interim relief was nevertheless granted for release of the goods and vehicle, subject to the petitioner making part payment in cash and furnishing a bank guarantee for the balance penalty. The connected writ petition was not pursued further. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456846 The Calcutta HC noted that disputed questions of fact concerning the existence of the consignor and consignee and ownership of the seized goods were unsuitable for writ adjudication, so the statutory appellate forum was the proper remedy. The writ challenge to the adjudication order and detention of goods was therefore not entertained on merits. Limited interim relief was nevertheless granted for release of the goods and vehicle, subject to the petitioner making part payment in cash and furnishing a bank guarantee for the balance penalty. The connected writ petition was not pursued further. Case-Laws GST Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456846