https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37929 The Full Bench validated the ITO's jurisdiction to call for information post-assessment, stating it falls within the scope of assessment duties. Regarding the reference to the Valuation Officer under s. 55A of the I.T. Act, it was deemed invalid as it did not apply to the case. The court upheld the applicability of s. 133(6) for information gathering and dismissed the writ petition, affirming the ITO's actions as lawful. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:16:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37929 The Full Bench validated the ITO's jurisdiction to call for information post-assessment, stating it falls within the scope of assessment duties. Regarding the reference to the Valuation Officer under s. 55A of the I.T. Act, it was deemed invalid as it did not apply to the case. The court upheld the applicability of s. 133(6) for information gathering and dismissed the writ petition, affirming the ITO's actions as lawful. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 06 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37929