<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 955 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757251</link>
    <description>The J&amp;amp;K HC held that appellate authority under Section 107(4) of the 2017 Act cannot entertain appeals filed beyond four months from communication of the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision. While the authority can condone delay up to one month after the prescribed three-month period, appeals beyond this four-month limit are barred. The HC noted that constitutional courts retain extraordinary jurisdiction to condone delay in exceptional circumstances where statutory application would cause gross injustice, but petitioner&#039;s reasons were insufficient. The writ petitions were dismissed as without merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 955 - JAMMU &amp; KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757251</link>
      <description>The J&amp;amp;K HC held that appellate authority under Section 107(4) of the 2017 Act cannot entertain appeals filed beyond four months from communication of the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision. While the authority can condone delay up to one month after the prescribed three-month period, appeals beyond this four-month limit are barred. The HC noted that constitutional courts retain extraordinary jurisdiction to condone delay in exceptional circumstances where statutory application would cause gross injustice, but petitioner&#039;s reasons were insufficient. The writ petitions were dismissed as without merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>