<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court dismisses plea on reversing input tax credit availed by buyer due to factual dispute, not jurisdictional error.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80539</link>
    <description>Petition dismissed by High Court regarding reversal of input tax credit. Court found it was not a case where authorities proceeded on assumption that input tax credit was wrongly availed by buyer despite existence of seller/supplier. Factual dispute raised, not jurisdictional issue or violation of natural justice principles. Petitioner granted liberty to pursue alternative remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:27:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court dismisses plea on reversing input tax credit availed by buyer due to factual dispute, not jurisdictional error.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80539</link>
      <description>Petition dismissed by High Court regarding reversal of input tax credit. Court found it was not a case where authorities proceeded on assumption that input tax credit was wrongly availed by buyer despite existence of seller/supplier. Factual dispute raised, not jurisdictional issue or violation of natural justice principles. Petitioner granted liberty to pursue alternative remedy.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:27:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>