<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1370 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456827</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled on delayed PF/ESIC employee contributions, following SC precedent in Checkmate Services case. Tribunal upheld disallowance of late deposits as per statutory requirements, but directed verification of actual amounts deposited late versus amounts disallowed. However, when the due date fell on Sunday, applying General Clauses Act provisions, payment made on next working day was deemed timely since banks were closed and no malafide intent existed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 22:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1370 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456827</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled on delayed PF/ESIC employee contributions, following SC precedent in Checkmate Services case. Tribunal upheld disallowance of late deposits as per statutory requirements, but directed verification of actual amounts deposited late versus amounts disallowed. However, when the due date fell on Sunday, applying General Clauses Act provisions, payment made on next working day was deemed timely since banks were closed and no malafide intent existed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>