https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456832 SC held that the earlier decision treating section 5 Limitation Act as applicable to appeals under the Commercial Courts Act was per incuriam and wrongly decided; appeals under section 37 of the Arbitration Act governed by the Commercial Courts Act attract a 60-day limitation under section 13(1A). Section 5 can only operate exceptionally to condone short delays where sufficient cause is shown and bona fide conduct is proved. On the facts, a 131-day delay beyond the 60-day period with no adequate explanation was not condonable, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Sep 2025 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456832 SC held that the earlier decision treating section 5 Limitation Act as applicable to appeals under the Commercial Courts Act was per incuriam and wrongly decided; appeals under section 37 of the Arbitration Act governed by the Commercial Courts Act attract a 60-day limitation under section 13(1A). Section 5 can only operate exceptionally to condone short delays where sufficient cause is shown and bona fide conduct is proved. On the facts, a 131-day delay beyond the 60-day period with no adequate explanation was not condonable, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456832