<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (1) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37911</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, upholding the department&#039;s decision to include interest and commission income in the assessee&#039;s total income for the assessment year. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting systems and disregarded the debtor-company&#039;s financial status and subsequent correspondence. It concluded that the assessee lacked reasonable justification for changing the accounting system from mercantile to cash basis, reaffirming the principle that altering accounting methods without proper justification may not be accepted for tax purposes. The judgment stressed the necessity of adhering to chosen accounting practices for income recognition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (1) TMI 37 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37911</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, upholding the department&#039;s decision to include interest and commission income in the assessee&#039;s total income for the assessment year. The Court emphasized the importance of consistency in accounting systems and disregarded the debtor-company&#039;s financial status and subsequent correspondence. It concluded that the assessee lacked reasonable justification for changing the accounting system from mercantile to cash basis, reaffirming the principle that altering accounting methods without proper justification may not be accepted for tax purposes. The judgment stressed the necessity of adhering to chosen accounting practices for income recognition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>