<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 35 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37899</link>
    <description>Actual user of land at the relevant date is the decisive test for its agricultural character under the Wealth-tax Act, and revenue records provide prima facie support for that classification. Land cultivated at the date of sale was treated as agricultural despite prior brick-making use, its location within municipal and town-planning limits, or its potential for non-agricultural development. A cultivation arrangement was not disqualified as a mere stop-gap on the facts stated, and permissions under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act and the Bombay Land Revenue Code did not by themselves alter the land&#039;s character at the date of sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 35 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37899</link>
      <description>Actual user of land at the relevant date is the decisive test for its agricultural character under the Wealth-tax Act, and revenue records provide prima facie support for that classification. Land cultivated at the date of sale was treated as agricultural despite prior brick-making use, its location within municipal and town-planning limits, or its potential for non-agricultural development. A cultivation arrangement was not disqualified as a mere stop-gap on the facts stated, and permissions under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act and the Bombay Land Revenue Code did not by themselves alter the land&#039;s character at the date of sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>