<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1042 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456825</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to additional depreciation. The submission of Form 3AA during assessment proceedings was deemed sufficient to qualify for the additional depreciation benefit. The court upheld that procedural compliance during the assessment was adequate for the claim, thus ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 10:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1042 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456825</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to additional depreciation. The submission of Form 3AA during assessment proceedings was deemed sufficient to qualify for the additional depreciation benefit. The court upheld that procedural compliance during the assessment was adequate for the claim, thus ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>