<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 877 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757173</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the addition of unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 148. The Tribunal concluded that the recorded reason for reopening was baseless, and the order favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 877 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757173</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the addition of unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under section 148. The Tribunal concluded that the recorded reason for reopening was baseless, and the order favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>