https://www.taxtmi.com/css/info/rss_sitemap/rss_feed.css?v=1746094055Tax Updates - Daily Update
https://www.taxtmi.com
Business/Tax/Law/GST/India/Taxation/Policies/Legal/Corporate Tax/Personal Tax/Vat Law/Legal Information/Tax Information/Legal Services/Tax ServicesTax Management India. Com / MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.One stop solution for Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes2024 (8) TMI 863 - ITAT JODHPUR
https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757159
https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757159Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Admission of additional evidences denied - assessee did not disclosed the income from other sources and no detail has been furnished in this regard - sum treated as undisclosed income of the assessee and taxed as per provision of 115BBE - also assessee has claimed deduction u/s 54F in the return under section 148 while in the original return no such claim was there - HELD THAT:- The bench noted that the appeal of the assessee dismissed without affording the opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The bench also noted that wife of the assessee expired and the assessee was passing through the tremor. Therefore could not submit the required documents before the ld. AO, moreover looking to the fact of the case that the assessment is made in these year on account of the fact that income wife after her death partly to be assessee in her name and partly in his name for the year under consideration as well as for the subsequent year. On account of the death of wife of the assessee he could not produce the details as it was not found properly at the time of proceeding before the lower authority. Even the status of mind of the assessee was under tremor. This resulted the non compliance before the ld. AO but at the first appeal stage before the ld. CIT(A) the assessee filed the additional evidence and prayed that the same be considered in light of the facts stated herein above. He further based on these facts submitted that the ld. CIT(A) should have considered the applications under rule 46A as the assessee being a village man, not technically equipped and unaware of such notice uploaded on the portal for which no intimation was received through mail or SMS skipped to check the portal and by time she assessed her e-portal she left heavenly abode. The assessment was completed. Therefore, we admit this evidence. Since, these additional evidence is also required to be tested on its merits in order to bring the correct fact on record and in order to charge the correct tax on the income of the assessee. As the ld. AR prayed that these facts are not examined by the CIT(A) and if given a chance the assessee would like to plead these contentions before the CIT(A) and based on these arguments he prayed to set aside the issue to the file of the ld. CIT(A). On the other hand, we found that the DR raise any general objection but there is no specific objection as to why the prayer of the assessee should not be accepted based on the factual aspect of the matter. These facts is not disputed by the revenue. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the assessee is deprived of justice. Assessee relied upon the judgement in the case of CIT vs. Virgin Securities and Credits (P) Ltd. [ 2011 (2) TMI 207 - DELHI HIGH COURT] wherein the court held that CIT(A) should admit the additional evidence if he finds that the same is crucial for disposal of the appeal of the assessee. Here we note that the additional evidence filed by the assessee is required to be seen to verify the nature of the income and under whose name it is to be taxed ergo we admit the additional evidence and set a side the matter to the file of the ld. AO to decide the issue based on the additional evidence and pass the order in accordance with the law. Our decision to restore the matter back to the file of the ld. AO shall in no way be construed as having any reflection or expression on the merits of the dispute, which shall be adjudicated by the ld. AO independently in accordance with law. Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.Case-LawsIncome TaxWed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530