<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 859 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757155</link>
    <description>A writ appeal concerning import of Clear Float Glass challenged differential duty and interest on the grounds of alleged lack of competence in issuing the show cause notice and limitation. The Kerala High Court rejected both objections, but modified the writ judgment by directing the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits independently and without being bound by the writ findings. The appeal was thus disposed of with that clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:02:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 859 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757155</link>
      <description>A writ appeal concerning import of Clear Float Glass challenged differential duty and interest on the grounds of alleged lack of competence in issuing the show cause notice and limitation. The Kerala High Court rejected both objections, but modified the writ judgment by directing the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits independently and without being bound by the writ findings. The appeal was thus disposed of with that clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>