https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757137 Article 32 relief was held inappropriate for electoral bond grievances based on alleged quid pro quo, because such claims would require a roving inquiry and the ordinary remedies under the criminal procedure framework, or where appropriate Article 226, had not first been shown ineffective. The Court also held that directions for recovery of alleged proceeds of crime and reopening of assessments would intrude into statutory functions assigned to competent authorities under the relevant enactments. On that basis, the request for a court-monitored SIT and the allied consequential reliefs was declined, and the writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:01:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757137 Article 32 relief was held inappropriate for electoral bond grievances based on alleged quid pro quo, because such claims would require a roving inquiry and the ordinary remedies under the criminal procedure framework, or where appropriate Article 226, had not first been shown ineffective. The Court also held that directions for recovery of alleged proceeds of crime and reopening of assessments would intrude into statutory functions assigned to competent authorities under the relevant enactments. On that basis, the request for a court-monitored SIT and the allied consequential reliefs was declined, and the writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757137