<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2035 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456808</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption of the sum received from BCCI under Section 10(17A) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and the CBDT Circular, asserting that exemptions must be granted if legally permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:13:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2035 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456808</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine the assessee&#039;s claim for exemption of the sum received from BCCI under Section 10(17A) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and the CBDT Circular, asserting that exemptions must be granted if legally permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>