https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456820 Section 14 of the Limitation Act applies only where the earlier proceeding was prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith and failed because the forum could not entertain it for defect of jurisdiction or a like cause. Here, the party persisted with a writ petition despite objection that the proper remedy was under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and then pursued special leave instead of promptly taking the correct statutory route. The earlier proceedings were therefore not shown to satisfy Section 14, the excluded period could not be extended to the intervals outside those proceedings, and the Section 34 petition remained out of time. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:13:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456820 Section 14 of the Limitation Act applies only where the earlier proceeding was prosecuted with due diligence and in good faith and failed because the forum could not entertain it for defect of jurisdiction or a like cause. Here, the party persisted with a writ petition despite objection that the proper remedy was under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, and then pursued special leave instead of promptly taking the correct statutory route. The earlier proceedings were therefore not shown to satisfy Section 14, the excluded period could not be extended to the intervals outside those proceedings, and the Section 34 petition remained out of time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456820