https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456806 A complaint filed through an authorised municipal prosecutor was treated in law as a complaint by the municipal corporation itself, since the prosecutor acted only in a representative capacity. Because a corporate local authority is not a public servant under criminal law, it could not claim the extended limitation period available to a public servant complainant. The applicable period was sixty days, and the appeal was filed beyond that limit even after excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy. The appeal was therefore barred by time and dismissed. en-us Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Aug 2024 18:05:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456806 A complaint filed through an authorised municipal prosecutor was treated in law as a complaint by the municipal corporation itself, since the prosecutor acted only in a representative capacity. Because a corporate local authority is not a public servant under criminal law, it could not claim the extended limitation period available to a public servant complainant. The applicable period was sixty days, and the appeal was filed beyond that limit even after excluding the time taken to obtain the certified copy. The appeal was therefore barred by time and dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456806