<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 840 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757136</link>
    <description>Goods detained under the Uttar Pradesh GST framework were found unsustainable where the invoice reflected the project site as the delivery address and that factual position was undisputed. In the absence of any material showing mens rea or an intention to evade tax, the seizure, show cause notice and penalty under Section 129 lacked legal basis. The detention and penalty were therefore quashed, and refund of the penalty amount was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 840 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757136</link>
      <description>Goods detained under the Uttar Pradesh GST framework were found unsustainable where the invoice reflected the project site as the delivery address and that factual position was undisputed. In the absence of any material showing mens rea or an intention to evade tax, the seizure, show cause notice and penalty under Section 129 lacked legal basis. The detention and penalty were therefore quashed, and refund of the penalty amount was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>