<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 821 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757117</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune held that voluntary compensation received by an employee upon resignation from service constitutes a capital receipt, not taxable under section 17(3) as profits in lieu of salary. The tribunal noted that other employees from the same company received identical treatment where assessing officers treated such compensation as capital in nature without revenue challenge, creating binding precedent. Following ITO vs. Avirook Sen, the tribunal ruled that ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules does not qualify as compensation under section 17(3). The addition was deleted and assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 821 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757117</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune held that voluntary compensation received by an employee upon resignation from service constitutes a capital receipt, not taxable under section 17(3) as profits in lieu of salary. The tribunal noted that other employees from the same company received identical treatment where assessing officers treated such compensation as capital in nature without revenue challenge, creating binding precedent. Following ITO vs. Avirook Sen, the tribunal ruled that ex-gratia compensation paid voluntarily without employer obligation under service rules does not qualify as compensation under section 17(3). The addition was deleted and assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>