<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Denies Stay Application; Assessee&#039;s Activities Contradict Trust Objectives, Leading to Registration Cancellation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80469</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) holds the power to grant stay of the operation of an order under challenge during its pendency, if non-granting of stay would render the appeal nugatory for the assessee upon success. Re-assessment proceedings are independent and cannot be considered a consequence of the impugned order cancelling registration. The PCIT (Central)-2, Delhi had jurisdiction to cancel the registration u/s 12AB with retrospective effect, as per precedents. The assessee&#039;s claim of carrying activities per trust objects is prima facie contradicted by materials gathered during a survey, indicating involvement in stopping coal-based power plants and mines, utilizing funds from foreign entities. The assessee failed to satisfy c.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:19:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:19:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Denies Stay Application; Assessee&#039;s Activities Contradict Trust Objectives, Leading to Registration Cancellation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80469</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) holds the power to grant stay of the operation of an order under challenge during its pendency, if non-granting of stay would render the appeal nugatory for the assessee upon success. Re-assessment proceedings are independent and cannot be considered a consequence of the impugned order cancelling registration. The PCIT (Central)-2, Delhi had jurisdiction to cancel the registration u/s 12AB with retrospective effect, as per precedents. The assessee&#039;s claim of carrying activities per trust objects is prima facie contradicted by materials gathered during a survey, indicating involvement in stopping coal-based power plants and mines, utilizing funds from foreign entities. The assessee failed to satisfy c.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:19:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>