<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 794 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757090</link>
    <description>Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects the corporate debtor&#039;s property from attachment, seizure, retention or confiscation for pre-CIRP offences once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31(1) and control shifts to an eligible new management. The provision is framed to give the successful resolution applicant a clean break from past misconduct, and its Explanation gives &quot;action against the property&quot; wide scope. On that basis, the benefit of Section 32A extended to the successful resolution applicant, and the attached properties ought to have been released; refusal to do so was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 794 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757090</link>
      <description>Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects the corporate debtor&#039;s property from attachment, seizure, retention or confiscation for pre-CIRP offences once a resolution plan is approved under Section 31(1) and control shifts to an eligible new management. The provision is framed to give the successful resolution applicant a clean break from past misconduct, and its Explanation gives &quot;action against the property&quot; wide scope. On that basis, the benefit of Section 32A extended to the successful resolution applicant, and the attached properties ought to have been released; refusal to do so was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>