<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456787</link>
    <description>Extended limitation cannot support denial of credit where the Revenue has taken divergent positions on the same entitlement issue and similarly placed assessees have received credit. Under the Jammu &amp; Kashmir exemption regime, conflicting departmental views showed that the issue was not sufficiently settled to justify invoking the extended period. As the show cause notice relied on that extended period, the limitation objection barred the credit denial, without requiring examination of the substantive credit claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 21:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456787</link>
      <description>Extended limitation cannot support denial of credit where the Revenue has taken divergent positions on the same entitlement issue and similarly placed assessees have received credit. Under the Jammu &amp; Kashmir exemption regime, conflicting departmental views showed that the issue was not sufficiently settled to justify invoking the extended period. As the show cause notice relied on that extended period, the limitation objection barred the credit denial, without requiring examination of the substantive credit claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>