<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1343 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456796</link>
    <description>A writ challenge was raised against a show-cause notice, an adjudication order passed during the writ proceedings, and notifications extending the time limit under Section 168A of the CGST Act, with objections based on lack of jurisdiction and breach of natural justice for refusal to consider an adjournment request. The Court noted that the adjudication order was statutorily appealable and indicated that the petition could be addressed either on its discretionary writ footing or by remitting the dispute for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner. The matter was kept pending for further consideration, with directions to list it after the petitioner took instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1343 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456796</link>
      <description>A writ challenge was raised against a show-cause notice, an adjudication order passed during the writ proceedings, and notifications extending the time limit under Section 168A of the CGST Act, with objections based on lack of jurisdiction and breach of natural justice for refusal to consider an adjournment request. The Court noted that the adjudication order was statutorily appealable and indicated that the petition could be addressed either on its discretionary writ footing or by remitting the dispute for fresh adjudication after hearing the petitioner. The matter was kept pending for further consideration, with directions to list it after the petitioner took instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>