https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456797 Interim protection was declined where the petitioner refused to deposit 10% of the disputed tax and also did not seek remand of the adjudication order. The court therefore permitted the respondents to proceed in accordance with law despite the pendency of the writ petition. It also directed exchange of affidavits for final adjudication on merits: the respondents are to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, the petitioner may reply within two weeks thereafter, and the matter is listed for final hearing in July 2024 with short written notes of arguments. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456797 Interim protection was declined where the petitioner refused to deposit 10% of the disputed tax and also did not seek remand of the adjudication order. The court therefore permitted the respondents to proceed in accordance with law despite the pendency of the writ petition. It also directed exchange of affidavits for final adjudication on merits: the respondents are to file an affidavit-in-opposition within four weeks, the petitioner may reply within two weeks thereafter, and the matter is listed for final hearing in July 2024 with short written notes of arguments. Case-Laws GST Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456797