<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1406 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456783</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal due to non-prosecution, as no representative appeared on the assessee&#039;s behalf, and there was no authorization for the representative present. The dismissal was in line with the precedent set in CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd., with the order pronounced on July 5, 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 11:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1406 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456783</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal due to non-prosecution, as no representative appeared on the assessee&#039;s behalf, and there was no authorization for the representative present. The dismissal was in line with the precedent set in CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd., with the order pronounced on July 5, 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>