<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 770 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757066</link>
    <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation does not absolve tax liability. The court found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically the denial of opportunity for hearing under Section 75(4) of GST Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh hearing, ensuring the petitioners&#039; right to be heard was respected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 770 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757066</link>
      <description>HC ruled that GST registration cancellation does not absolve tax liability. The court found procedural irregularities in the assessment order, specifically the denial of opportunity for hearing under Section 75(4) of GST Act. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for a fresh hearing, ensuring the petitioners&#039; right to be heard was respected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>