<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 769 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757065</link>
    <description>The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal remedy within the time granted by the Court. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal after adjusting the input tax credit already blocked, so the substantive challenge was left to be examined in the statutory appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 00:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 769 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757065</link>
      <description>The writ petitions were disposed of with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal remedy within the time granted by the Court. The appellate authority was directed to consider the appeal after adjusting the input tax credit already blocked, so the substantive challenge was left to be examined in the statutory appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>