<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 767 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757063</link>
    <description>HC ruled on GST assessment orders for multiple tax years, finding procedural irregularities in the tax department&#039;s approach. The court conditionally set aside the impugned orders, directing the petitioner to remit 5% of disputed tax demands and submit detailed replies within 15 days. The respondent was instructed to provide a fresh opportunity for review within three months, ensuring proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s submissions and computational accuracy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 767 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757063</link>
      <description>HC ruled on GST assessment orders for multiple tax years, finding procedural irregularities in the tax department&#039;s approach. The court conditionally set aside the impugned orders, directing the petitioner to remit 5% of disputed tax demands and submit detailed replies within 15 days. The respondent was instructed to provide a fresh opportunity for review within three months, ensuring proper consideration of the petitioner&#039;s submissions and computational accuracy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>