<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (10) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37864</link>
    <description>Where annuity deposits are repaid after disruption of a joint Hindu family, taxability depends on the status of the recipients at the time of receipt. After partition, the coparceners cease to form a joint family and their shares become defined, so the repayment cannot be assessed in the hands of the former karta as if the family continued. The annuity retains its character as income in the hands of each divided coparcener and is not treated as capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:15:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (10) TMI 12 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37864</link>
      <description>Where annuity deposits are repaid after disruption of a joint Hindu family, taxability depends on the status of the recipients at the time of receipt. After partition, the coparceners cease to form a joint family and their shares become defined, so the repayment cannot be assessed in the hands of the former karta as if the family continued. The annuity retains its character as income in the hands of each divided coparcener and is not treated as capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>