https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80417 The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher sales compared to previous periods. The explanation of receiving cash from customers for jewelry sales was considered reasonable. The appellant provided evidence of sufficient cash withdrawals before demonetization, supporting the cash deposits. The Tribunal found the explanation satisfactory, citing a precedent. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions by the Commissioner, dismissing the revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:33:04 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80417 The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher sales compared to previous periods. The explanation of receiving cash from customers for jewelry sales was considered reasonable. The appellant provided evidence of sufficient cash withdrawals before demonetization, supporting the cash deposits. The Tribunal found the explanation satisfactory, citing a precedent. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions by the Commissioner, dismissing the revenue's appeal. Highlights Income Tax Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:33:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=80417