<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 728 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757024</link>
    <description>In customs valuation disputes involving second-hand machinery, the note states that a declared value already assessed on the basis of inspection and chartered engineer certificates under the governing circular cannot be displaced without lawful challenge and reliable proof of undervaluation. It further states that electronic printouts and device data relied upon for valuation or demand are inadmissible unless supported by the statutory certificate required for electronic records under section 138C of the Customs Act, 1962. On that reasoning, the note records that undervaluation was not established and electronic evidence could not sustain duty demand, interest, or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 728 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757024</link>
      <description>In customs valuation disputes involving second-hand machinery, the note states that a declared value already assessed on the basis of inspection and chartered engineer certificates under the governing circular cannot be displaced without lawful challenge and reliable proof of undervaluation. It further states that electronic printouts and device data relied upon for valuation or demand are inadmissible unless supported by the statutory certificate required for electronic records under section 138C of the Customs Act, 1962. On that reasoning, the note records that undervaluation was not established and electronic evidence could not sustain duty demand, interest, or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>