https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757019 The Court clarified that its earlier observations were not intended to decide whether a complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of the Directorate of Enforcement. It held that no opinion had been expressed on that question, which must be decided by the competent court in accordance with law. The earlier order was modified to remove any unintended impression that maintainability had been affirmed, while leaving the aggrieved party free to pursue available remedies. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:32:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757019 The Court clarified that its earlier observations were not intended to decide whether a complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is maintainable at the instance of the Directorate of Enforcement. It held that no opinion had been expressed on that question, which must be decided by the competent court in accordance with law. The earlier order was modified to remove any unintended impression that maintainability had been affirmed, while leaving the aggrieved party free to pursue available remedies. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757019