https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757015 A writ petition challenging a Tribunal order enforcing the statutory pre-deposit requirement was held not maintainable, because the order fell within the statutory appellate framework under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and could not be bypassed through writ jurisdiction. The Court found no indication of lack of jurisdiction in the Tribunal or breach of natural justice, and observed that entertaining the writ would effectively defeat the legislative scheme of appeal and compliance. The petition was also rejected on the ground of availability of an alternative statutory remedy and the territorial jurisdiction objection. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757015 A writ petition challenging a Tribunal order enforcing the statutory pre-deposit requirement was held not maintainable, because the order fell within the statutory appellate framework under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and could not be bypassed through writ jurisdiction. The Court found no indication of lack of jurisdiction in the Tribunal or breach of natural justice, and observed that entertaining the writ would effectively defeat the legislative scheme of appeal and compliance. The petition was also rejected on the ground of availability of an alternative statutory remedy and the territorial jurisdiction objection. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=757015