<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1327 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456770</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit with interest and penalty. The appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on duty-paid inputs in stock when goods became dutiable from 01.06.2006. The goods were imported and supplied by Central Warehouse with duty paid as evidenced by Bills of Entry and ER-1 returns. The Commissioner wrongly denied credit despite availability of duty-paying documents and misinterpreted the tribunal&#039;s limited remand order for document verification. The ER-1 statutory record established duty payment beyond doubt, and denial of credit on superficial grounds was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=764022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1327 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456770</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit with interest and penalty. The appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on duty-paid inputs in stock when goods became dutiable from 01.06.2006. The goods were imported and supplied by Central Warehouse with duty paid as evidenced by Bills of Entry and ER-1 returns. The Commissioner wrongly denied credit despite availability of duty-paying documents and misinterpreted the tribunal&#039;s limited remand order for document verification. The ER-1 statutory record established duty payment beyond doubt, and denial of credit on superficial grounds was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>