https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456777 The SC refused to condone an inordinate delay of approximately 21 years in filing special leave petitions challenging land acquisition compensation. The petitioners failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay and had accepted compensation at Rs. 30 per square yard as determined by the reference court. When the HC reduced compensation to Rs. 22 per square yard, petitioners made no grievance for 21 years. The SC applied the doctrine of acquiescence, holding that petitioners lost their right to complain by accepting the compensation without objection. The court noted practical difficulties in recovering differential amounts from allottees after decades and refused condonation, dismissing the SLP. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2024 19:58:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456777 The SC refused to condone an inordinate delay of approximately 21 years in filing special leave petitions challenging land acquisition compensation. The petitioners failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay and had accepted compensation at Rs. 30 per square yard as determined by the reference court. When the HC reduced compensation to Rs. 22 per square yard, petitioners made no grievance for 21 years. The SC applied the doctrine of acquiescence, holding that petitioners lost their right to complain by accepting the compensation without objection. The court noted practical difficulties in recovering differential amounts from allottees after decades and refused condonation, dismissing the SLP. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456777