https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456766 The Board allowed the appeal, overturning the contempt conviction and ordering the refund of the fine and costs. It emphasized the rarity and discretion required in contempt cases, distinguishing between legitimate criticism and contemptuous conduct. The ruling clarified that unfounded criticism of a judge's non-judicial actions should be addressed through ordinary legal remedies, not contempt proceedings. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:45:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456766 The Board allowed the appeal, overturning the contempt conviction and ordering the refund of the fine and costs. It emphasized the rarity and discretion required in contempt cases, distinguishing between legitimate criticism and contemptuous conduct. The ruling clarified that unfounded criticism of a judge's non-judicial actions should be addressed through ordinary legal remedies, not contempt proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Jul 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456766