<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1305 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456765</link>
    <description>The SC directed the determination of family pension for a widow, which led to contempt petitions due to alleged non-compliance. The Court dismissed Contempt Petition 3/2012 and closed Petitions 6/2009 and 7/2009, finding no clear evidence of willful disobedience by the Respondents regarding pension calculations and compliance with previous orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:42:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1305 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456765</link>
      <description>The SC directed the determination of family pension for a widow, which led to contempt petitions due to alleged non-compliance. The Court dismissed Contempt Petition 3/2012 and closed Petitions 6/2009 and 7/2009, finding no clear evidence of willful disobedience by the Respondents regarding pension calculations and compliance with previous orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>