https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756994 A jurisdictional challenge was raised to notices and an adjudication order under Section 73, on the basis that the time to pass the order had been extended under Section 168A without the requisite force majeure circumstances and that a valuable right had accrued. The HC found a prima facie case for interim protection and noted that a coordinate Bench had already granted limited relief in an identical matter. The impugned demand in the order dated 15 April 2024 was stayed until the end of November 2024 or further order, and affidavits were directed to be exchanged for continued hearing. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 May 2025 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756994 A jurisdictional challenge was raised to notices and an adjudication order under Section 73, on the basis that the time to pass the order had been extended under Section 168A without the requisite force majeure circumstances and that a valuable right had accrued. The HC found a prima facie case for interim protection and noted that a coordinate Bench had already granted limited relief in an identical matter. The impugned demand in the order dated 15 April 2024 was stayed until the end of November 2024 or further order, and affidavits were directed to be exchanged for continued hearing. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756994