<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37847</link>
    <description>Tax liability arising under the voluntary disclosure scheme in section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 was treated as a present and ascertainable debt on the valuation date, not a contingent liability. On that basis, the liability was held to fall within &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, because the charging provisions created an existing obligation even though quantification or payment occurred later. The Court rejected the argument that the disclosure tax was an ad hoc charge outside the income-tax charging framework. The tax payable under section 68(3) was therefore deductible in computing net wealth, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:56:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 52 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37847</link>
      <description>Tax liability arising under the voluntary disclosure scheme in section 68 of the Finance Act, 1965 was treated as a present and ascertainable debt on the valuation date, not a contingent liability. On that basis, the liability was held to fall within &quot;debt owed&quot; under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, because the charging provisions created an existing obligation even though quantification or payment occurred later. The Court rejected the argument that the disclosure tax was an ad hoc charge outside the income-tax charging framework. The tax payable under section 68(3) was therefore deductible in computing net wealth, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>