<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 667 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756963</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeal after determining that the provisional attachment order and its confirmation could not persist due to the appellants&#039; discharge from the predicate and money laundering offences. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with the Apex Court&#039;s judgment, granting respondents the option to seek revival if the predicate agency successfully challenges the discharge orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 667 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756963</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeal after determining that the provisional attachment order and its confirmation could not persist due to the appellants&#039; discharge from the predicate and money laundering offences. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with the Apex Court&#039;s judgment, granting respondents the option to seek revival if the predicate agency successfully challenges the discharge orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>