<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 664 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA ; AT NEW DELHI.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756960</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed appeals by two employees charged under FEMA Section 5 for carrying US$ 50,000 in traveler&#039;s cheques to Sri Lanka without RBI permission. The Export Executive appellant claimed ignorance of the violation, while the Finance Manager appellant denied involvement in procuring additional foreign exchange. The Tribunal held both liable - the Export Executive for failing to verify RBI permission despite ignorance of law being no excuse, and the Finance Manager for vicarious liability given his position. However, considering their minor roles as employees compared to company directors, the Tribunal reduced their penalties from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000 each, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:05:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 664 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA ; AT NEW DELHI.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756960</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed appeals by two employees charged under FEMA Section 5 for carrying US$ 50,000 in traveler&#039;s cheques to Sri Lanka without RBI permission. The Export Executive appellant claimed ignorance of the violation, while the Finance Manager appellant denied involvement in procuring additional foreign exchange. The Tribunal held both liable - the Export Executive for failing to verify RBI permission despite ignorance of law being no excuse, and the Finance Manager for vicarious liability given his position. However, considering their minor roles as employees compared to company directors, the Tribunal reduced their penalties from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 50,000 each, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>