https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756955 CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of appellant engaged in providing taxable services and manufacturing exempted goods. Appellant properly maintained separate accounts for exclusive services and inputs, correctly availed 100% CENVAT Credit on common services covered under Rule 6(5) including security services and bank charges, and stayed within 20% limit under Rule 6(3)(c) during 2006-07 and 2007-08. No CENVAT Credit reversal required. Show Cause Notice proceedings unsustainable. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:05:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756955 CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of appellant engaged in providing taxable services and manufacturing exempted goods. Appellant properly maintained separate accounts for exclusive services and inputs, correctly availed 100% CENVAT Credit on common services covered under Rule 6(5) including security services and bank charges, and stayed within 20% limit under Rule 6(3)(c) during 2006-07 and 2007-08. No CENVAT Credit reversal required. Show Cause Notice proceedings unsustainable. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756955