<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 658 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756954</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding service tax liability under Construction of Residential Complex Services and Works Contract Service for June 2007 to May 2008. Following the precedent in Krishna Homes case, the Tribunal held that service tax demand against promoter/developer/builder cannot sustain for the period prior to 01.07.2010. The impugned order was set aside regarding confirmation of service tax demand and interest, with the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 658 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756954</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal regarding service tax liability under Construction of Residential Complex Services and Works Contract Service for June 2007 to May 2008. Following the precedent in Krishna Homes case, the Tribunal held that service tax demand against promoter/developer/builder cannot sustain for the period prior to 01.07.2010. The impugned order was set aside regarding confirmation of service tax demand and interest, with the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>