<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1435 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456756</link>
    <description>Interference with the High Court&#039;s quashing of show cause notices was declined because the notices were issued after a long unexplained delay. The assessment period covered 2011-2016, but the notices were served only on 24.03.2021, creating a delay of about five to ten years. As no justification was offered for the belated action, the notices were treated as barred by delay and laches. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1435 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456756</link>
      <description>Interference with the High Court&#039;s quashing of show cause notices was declined because the notices were issued after a long unexplained delay. The assessment period covered 2011-2016, but the notices were served only on 24.03.2021, creating a delay of about five to ten years. As no justification was offered for the belated action, the notices were treated as barred by delay and laches. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>