<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1504 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456758</link>
    <description>Fair disclosure rights concerning unrelied-upon material were explained as part of the accused&#039;s fair trial protection during investigation and trial, with any request for production of documents to be considered through the prescribed procedure on relevance. The Supreme Court said that this principle could not be invoked at the appellate stage to postpone hearing of the death reference and connected appeals, which is governed separately by the provisions on additional evidence. A late request made after final hearing was fixed and after repeated opportunities was found unjustified, and the Court deprecated dilatory tactics in death reference matters, permitting the High Court to proceed with the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1504 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456758</link>
      <description>Fair disclosure rights concerning unrelied-upon material were explained as part of the accused&#039;s fair trial protection during investigation and trial, with any request for production of documents to be considered through the prescribed procedure on relevance. The Supreme Court said that this principle could not be invoked at the appellate stage to postpone hearing of the death reference and connected appeals, which is governed separately by the provisions on additional evidence. A late request made after final hearing was fixed and after repeated opportunities was found unjustified, and the Court deprecated dilatory tactics in death reference matters, permitting the High Court to proceed with the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>