https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745 Civil contempt based on breach of undertaking requires clear proof that an undertaking was given to the Court, formed part of the proceedings, and induced the Court's order or forbearance. On the record, the alleged oral assurance was not shown with reasonable certainty to be a court undertaking, so breach of undertaking was not proved. A later status quo direction, made after the cabins had already been removed and the site was in municipal possession, was construed as preserving the existing position and not barring regulated use of an open site. No contempt was established on that basis. en-us Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:51:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745 Civil contempt based on breach of undertaking requires clear proof that an undertaking was given to the Court, formed part of the proceedings, and induced the Court's order or forbearance. On the record, the alleged oral assurance was not shown with reasonable certainty to be a court undertaking, so breach of undertaking was not proved. A later status quo direction, made after the cabins had already been removed and the site was in municipal possession, was construed as preserving the existing position and not barring regulated use of an open site. No contempt was established on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745