<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1024 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745</link>
    <description>The HC discharged the contempt notices against the respondents, determining their actions did not constitute civil or criminal contempt. The court criticized the respondents for irresponsible conduct and ordered them to bear the costs of the proceedings, amounting to Rs. 5,000 each, payable to the State Legal Services Authority. The issue of compensation for the demolition of cabins was left open for substantive proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1024 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745</link>
      <description>The HC discharged the contempt notices against the respondents, determining their actions did not constitute civil or criminal contempt. The court criticized the respondents for irresponsible conduct and ordered them to bear the costs of the proceedings, amounting to Rs. 5,000 each, payable to the State Legal Services Authority. The issue of compensation for the demolition of cabins was left open for substantive proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>