https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456741 The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the Cal HC's decision that the Chief Minister's speech constituted contempt of court. The speech was deemed to interfere with the administration of justice by fostering public prejudice against the petitioners and deterring others from seeking judicial relief. The court emphasized that intention is not decisive; the focus is on whether the act tends to interfere with justice. The Chief Minister's conduct was deemed improper and contumacious, warranting disapproval. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:23:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456741 The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the Cal HC's decision that the Chief Minister's speech constituted contempt of court. The speech was deemed to interfere with the administration of justice by fostering public prejudice against the petitioners and deterring others from seeking judicial relief. The court emphasized that intention is not decisive; the focus is on whether the act tends to interfere with justice. The Chief Minister's conduct was deemed improper and contumacious, warranting disapproval. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456741