https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756936 A GST writ challenge raised a jurisdictional issue over whether the time limit for passing an order under section 73 had been extended by notifications issued under section 168A. The HC found a prima facie case and noted an identical limited interim order passed by a Coordinate Bench. Pending exchange of affidavits, the impugned demand was stayed until the end of December 2024 or until further order, whichever was earlier, and the petition was directed to proceed thereafter. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756936 A GST writ challenge raised a jurisdictional issue over whether the time limit for passing an order under section 73 had been extended by notifications issued under section 168A. The HC found a prima facie case and noted an identical limited interim order passed by a Coordinate Bench. Pending exchange of affidavits, the impugned demand was stayed until the end of December 2024 or until further order, whichever was earlier, and the petition was directed to proceed thereafter. Case-Laws GST Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756936