<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 632 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756928</link>
    <description>The HC remanded the appeals to the ITAT for a fresh determination on the nature of income received by the Kerala Cricket Association from the Board for Control of Cricket in India, following the SC&#039;s observations. The ITAT must decide if the income qualifies as infrastructure subsidy or business income under Section 2(15) of the IT Act, allowing both parties to present arguments within six months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=763813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 632 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756928</link>
      <description>The HC remanded the appeals to the ITAT for a fresh determination on the nature of income received by the Kerala Cricket Association from the Board for Control of Cricket in India, following the SC&#039;s observations. The ITAT must decide if the income qualifies as infrastructure subsidy or business income under Section 2(15) of the IT Act, allowing both parties to present arguments within six months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=756928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>